Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2500 bulk RNA-Seq of Suaeda salsa (halophyte) with 195 million short reads and 39.4 Gb at very poor quality (3.6% Q20, 1.3% Q30, 0.201% N content). Severe systematic quality degradation indicates library or sequencing issues; data likely unsuitable without extensive validation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0