← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 30 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
30 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
human gut metagenome
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
2,979 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
3903936872996
reported
total reads
21509842753
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
98.1
measured
pct q30 bases
94.7
measured
gc content pct
44.5
measured
mean read length
92.6
measured
mean base quality
35.8
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
6.19
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
94.7
measured
×1
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
13 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0