← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
GridION
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1,638 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
5854230463090.001
reported
total reads
20405559129
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
97.9
measured
pct q30 bases
94.5
measured
gc content pct
48.2
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
38.9
measured
adapter content pct
2.98
measured
duplication rate pct
15.6
measured
mean target coverage
63632939.8
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 95/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
94.5
measured
×1
100%
adapter content pct
2.98
measured
×0.5
86%
QC cost
11 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0