PRJNA412408

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

methylation

Organism

Gallus gallus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

N numbers (samples, groups)

78 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 574750299090 reported

total reads 2805689027 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 98.6 measured

pct q30 bases 95.2 measured

gc content pct 51.5 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 36.5 measured

adapter content pct 0.03 measured

duplication rate pct 62.14 measured

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.2 measured ×1 100%

QC cost 17 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 91

Whole genome and transcriptome maps of the entirely black na... L1 91/100