Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
29/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
RNA-seq of the thermophilic bacterium Geobacillus stearothermophilus ATCC 12980 on MiSeq yields only 644 million bases (4.3 million reads) with lower quality (74.9% Q30 bases). The small dataset and modest quality restrict transcriptome coverage; useful primarily for discovery in a well-characterized model organism where low-abundance transcripts may be less critical.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0