Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Escherichia coli amplicon-seq on HiSeq 4000 yields 51 billion bases (255 million reads) with excellent quality (96.6% Q30 bases), providing exceptional depth for targeted bacterial genomics. The massive amplicon dataset enables ultra-sensitive variant detection, monitoring of very low-frequency mutations, and population-level evolutionary studies in this model organism.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0