Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Oral metagenome whole-genome sequencing on MiSeq generates 12 billion bases (20.6 million reads) with moderate quality (68.3% Q30 bases) and elevated N content (0.056%), indicating some sequencing uncertainty. The dataset captures oral microbial community structure and host oral tissue, though the lower quality and modest coverage limit assembly of individual genomes or detection of rare variants in low-frequency organisms.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0