Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
75/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This WGS dataset of Zea mays subsp. mays (maize) on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 generated 161 million reads with 80.4% Q30 bases, supporting crop genome analysis and breeding applications. Researchers investigating genomic selection, hybrid genetics, or agronomic trait mapping will find genome-level sequence data for variant discovery and marker development. The 45.3% GC content is typical for plant genomes.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0