← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
44/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
human gut metagenome
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
11 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
10713491000
reported
total reads
21426982
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
87.3
measured
pct q30 bases
82.5
measured
gc content pct
47.2
measured
mean read length
250
measured
mean base quality
32.4
measured
adapter content pct
69.73
measured
duplication rate pct
81.96
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 44/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
82.5
measured
×1
63%
mean base quality
32.4
measured
×0.6
73%
adapter content pct
69.73
measured
×0.4
0%
duplication rate pct
81.96
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
29 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0