Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This feces metagenome amplicon dataset on an Ion Torrent PGM platform generated 7.1 million reads with 62.4% Q30 bases, capturing gut microbiota via Ion Torrent sequencing chemistry. Researchers comparing Ion Torrent against Illumina amplicon performance or examining legacy Ion Torrent microbiome datasets will find platform-specific read characteristics useful for methodology benchmarking. The quality profile reflects Ion Torrent's known performance with longer homopolymer-prone reads.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0