Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
59/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This amplicon metagenome survey generated on Illumina MiSeq delivers ~4.5 billion bases with good quality (82.7% Q30 bases), optimized for targeted PCR-amplified profiling of microbial or other communities. The amplicon approach enables deep taxonomic coverage of selected marker genes (e.g., 16S rRNA) with a modest run size, though bias toward the amplified targets limits assessment of non-targeted diversity.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0