Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This WGS dataset of Eutrema heterophyllum on an Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform generated 937 million reads with 83.7% Q30 bases, providing substantial genome coverage for plant genomics research. Researchers investigating genome structure, polyploidy, or environmental adaptation in this plant species will have sufficient sequencing depth for variant discovery and structural analysis. The dataset supports high-quality genome assembly for non-model plant species.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0