Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Targeted WES of Lepus americanus. Grade D (67/100) — marginal for exome sequencing. Q30 bases at 77.4% (measured, scored 37/100) fall significantly below the 90%+ standard for reliable variant calling; mean quality (31, measured) is moderate, compromising sensitivity for heterozygous and rare variants, and stringent filtering will be required to distinguish true variants from sequencing artifacts.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0