Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
49/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 2500 whole-genome sequencing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with 298 million short reads and 6,212× mean coverage of 74.5 Gb at moderate quality (72.9% Q20, 68.7% Q30). Extreme depth far exceeds model organism requirements; suitable for rare variant detection or consensus-calling benchmarking.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0