Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This whole-exome sequencing (WES) dataset of Homo sapiens on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 generated 2.8 billion reads with 91.6% Q30 bases, providing high-coverage targeted genomic data for clinical and research applications. Researchers performing disease-gene discovery, variant interpretation, or human population genetics will find exome-level coverage sufficient for rare-variant detection and functional annotation. The elevated 55.9% GC content reflects targeted enrichment of coding regions.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0