Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Amplicon sequencing of Pyrococcus furiosus on MiSeq yields 4.8 billion bases (23.5 million reads) with high quality (91.7% Q30 bases), optimized for marker-gene profiling of this hyperthermophilic archaeon. The good quality supports confident identification and quantification of target loci, though the modest dataset size suits single-organism or limited-sample investigations.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0