PRJNA42763

BioProject first seen 2016

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

47/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Phocaeicola vulgatus PC510

Instrument

454 GS FLX

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 377773002 reported

total reads 695487 reported

n content pct 0.022 measured

pct q20 bases 89.4 measured

pct q30 bases 72.9 measured

gc content pct 41.9 measured

mean read length 415.4 measured

mean base quality 33.4 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 18.18 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 72.9 measured ×1 14%

duplication rate pct 18.18 measured ×0.5 68%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0