← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 4 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
4 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
0/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
human metagenome
Instrument
454 GS FLX
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), submitted files
N numbers (samples, groups)
14,212 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
22816155141620
reported
total reads
114478861369
reported
n content pct
0.018
measured
pct q20 bases
77
measured
pct q30 bases
46.5
measured
gc content pct
44.8
measured
mean read length
75
measured
mean base quality
24.1
measured
adapter content pct
18.49
measured
duplication rate pct
2.84
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 0/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
46.5
measured
×1
0%
adapter content pct
18.49
measured
×0.5
0%
QC cost
10 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0