← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
75/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
BGISEQ-500
Platform
BGISEQ
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
721 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
921062950200
reported
total reads
7303359227
reported
n content pct
0.003
measured
pct q20 bases
98.8
measured
pct q30 bases
96.7
measured
gc content pct
51
measured
mean read length
100
measured
mean base quality
39.6
measured
adapter content pct
24.81
measured
duplication rate pct
51.57
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 75/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
96.7
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
39.6
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
24.81
measured
×0.4
0%
duplication rate pct
51.57
measured
×0.4
52%
QC cost
23 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0