← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
17/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Rattus norvegicus
Instrument
Ion Torrent Proton
Platform
ION_TORRENT
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
9 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
35754234565
reported
total reads
973182433
reported
n content pct
84.741
measured
pct q20 bases
13.2
measured
pct q30 bases
12.5
measured
gc content pct
11.7
measured
mean read length
38.1
measured
mean base quality
6.5
measured
adapter content pct
0.94
measured
duplication rate pct
98.54
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 17/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
12.5
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
6.5
measured
×0.6
0%
adapter content pct
0.94
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
98.54
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
31 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0