Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This amplicon dataset from Rattus norvegicus on an HiSeq X Ten platform generated 45 million reads with 95.1% Q30 bases, enabling high-confidence microbiota or genomic variant studies in a model organism. Researchers using rats for disease models, pharmacogenomics, or microbiota-phenotype association studies will find reliable amplicon sequence data. The high quality supports stringent variant calling and accurate taxonomic assignment in model organism research.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0