← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
384 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
859644992886
reported
total reads
8348325688
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
95.6
measured
pct q30 bases
93.6
measured
gc content pct
54.6
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
36
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
96.9
measured
mean target coverage
13865.2
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
93.6
measured
×1
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
5 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0