Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Pseudomonas koreensis hybrid short- and long-read genome sequencing on MiSeq generates 14.7 billion bases (3 million reads) with concerning Q30 bases (0%), flagging potential platform problems or basecalling issues. Despite the Q30 concern, the hybrid read structure and high base count may still permit assembly; independent quality assessment and long-read reliance recommended to validate genome structure.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0