Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This West Nile virus amplicon dataset on an Illumina MiSeq platform generated 47 million reads with 93.1% Q30 bases, capturing viral sequence variation for surveillance and epidemiological tracking. Researchers monitoring West Nile virus evolution, geographic distribution, or host adaptation will find amplicon-based genomic data suitable for phylogenetic and population-level analyses. The dataset demonstrates high-throughput multiplexed viral surveillance.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0