← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
ATAC-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
58 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
232481372049
reported
total reads
2696569983
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
98.2
measured
pct q30 bases
95.4
measured
gc content pct
47.1
measured
mean read length
78.3
measured
mean base quality
36.8
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
16.27
measured
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ATAC-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
95.4
measured
×1
100%
QC cost
29 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0