PRJNA445516

BioProject first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

81/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read WGS of Staphylococcus aureus (bacterial). Grade B (81/100) — good bacterial genome data. Duplication at 29.24% (measured) moderates the score but is not unexpected in clonal bacteria; Q30 content (94.8%, measured) is excellent and supports variant detection, and the large sample size (708M reads) provides sufficient depth for consensus genome and population variants.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Staphylococcus aureus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

389 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 141735122600 reported

total reads 708675613 reported

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 98.6 measured

pct q30 bases 94.8 measured

gc content pct 34.8 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 36.8 measured

adapter content pct 1.84 measured

duplication rate pct 29.24 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 81/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.8 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 29.24 measured ×0.5 34%

adapter content pct 1.84 measured ×0.4 94%

QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0