Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Synthetic construct full-length cDNA sequencing via Oxford Nanopore MinION yields 4.2 billion bases (828,000 reads) with very low accuracy (5.7% Q20 bases, 0% Q30 bases), characteristic of long-read nanopore technology. The dataset enables full-transcript isoform resolution of the synthetic RNA construct, though low per-read accuracy necessitates high sequencing depth or complementary short-read polishing for consensus accuracy.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0