← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
18 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
235675748400
reported
total reads
785585828
reported
n content pct
0.016
measured
pct q20 bases
97.6
measured
pct q30 bases
94.1
measured
gc content pct
40.8
measured
mean read length
150
measured
mean base quality
38.9
measured
adapter content pct
0.82
measured
duplication rate pct
50.6
measured
mean target coverage
4364.4
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 84/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean target coverage
4364.4
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
94.1
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
50.6
measured
×0.5
0%
adapter content pct
0.82
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
30 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0