← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Eggerthella lenta 1_1_60AFAA
Instrument
454 GS FLX Titanium
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
4 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
168762579
reported
total reads
350916
reported
n content pct
0.037
measured
pct q20 bases
89.4
measured
pct q30 bases
69.7
measured
gc content pct
59.3
measured
mean read length
324.8
measured
mean base quality
32.5
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
25.33
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 33/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
69.7
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
25.33
measured
×0.5
46%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
6 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0