Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This plant metagenome amplicon dataset on an Illumina MiSeq platform contains 2.8 million reads with 87% Q30 bases, capturing rhizosphere or phyllosphere microbial communities. Researchers investigating plant-microbe interactions, root colonization, or plant-associated microbiota will find amplicon data for microbial taxonomy and compositional analysis. The modest read count is suitable for single-plant samples or focused environmental profiling.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0