Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
46/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This amplicon dataset from leaf litter metagenome on an Illumina MiSeq captured 62 million reads with 73.7% Q30 bases, providing access to soil and decomposer microbial communities in terrestrial ecosystems. Researchers investigating fungal and bacterial diversity in decomposition ecology, nutrient cycling, or environmental microbiology will find taxonomic and compositional data. The lower Q30 percentage reflects the typical complexity of amplicons from diverse environmental DNA templates.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0