← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
71/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Listeria innocua
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1,143 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
371465346485
reported
total reads
1864413192
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
99.5
measured
pct q30 bases
97.2
measured
gc content pct
39.7
measured
mean read length
99.7
measured
mean base quality
37.3
measured
adapter content pct
11.37
measured
duplication rate pct
24.2
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 71/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
97.2
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
24.2
measured
×0.5
49%
adapter content pct
11.37
measured
×0.4
26%
QC cost
20 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0