Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Aeromonas hydrophila hybrid short- and long-read genome sequencing on MiSeq generates 10.2 billion bases (14.3 million reads) with low Q30 for long reads (27.1%), typical of nanopore-hybrid datasets. The long-read component enables resolution of repetitive regions and plasmids despite modest short-read Q30; useful for complete or circular genome assembly of this opportunistic pathogen.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0