PRJNA477447

BioProject first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

73/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-seq with acceptable but suboptimal quality, grading C. Q30 at 80.3% (weight-1 metric, scored 52/100) and duplication at 43.98% limit confidence in low-abundance transcripts. Suitable for robust gene-level estimates but less reliable for isoform discovery or rare-variant detection.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Candidozyma auris

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

22 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 20609378250 reported

total reads 412187565 reported

n content pct 0.007 measured

pct q20 bases 91.3 measured

pct q30 bases 80.3 measured

gc content pct 48.2 measured

mean read length 50 measured

mean base quality 33.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 43.98 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 73/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 80.3 measured ×1 52%

mean base quality 33.6 measured ×0.6 93%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 43.98 measured ×0.4 69%

QC cost 30 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0