Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA481417

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

95/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Abalone (Haliotis diversicolor) bulk-RNA-seq on HiSeq 2000 with 43.4 million 125 bp reads at 98.7% Q20 and 96.5% Q30 across 10.8 Gb provides good-quality transcriptome profiling. The 42.8% GC reflects molluscan genomes; sufficient depth for studying aquaculture traits, stress tolerance, and reproductive biology in abalone.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Haliotis diversicolor
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
4 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 10841661250 reported
total reads 43366645 reported
n content pct 0 measured
pct q20 bases 98.7 measured
pct q30 bases 96.5 measured
gc content pct 42.8 measured
mean read length 125 measured
mean base quality 40.2 measured
adapter content pct 1.11 measured
duplication rate pct 43.92 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 95/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.5 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 40.2 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 1.11 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 43.92 measured ×0.4 69%
QC cost 12 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 80