Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This hybrid-read WGS dataset of Klebsiella pneumoniae on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 contains 1.9 million reads with very low short-read quality (0.5% Q30), reflecting a challenging hybrid experiment where long reads compensate for short-read limitations. Researchers assembling complex bacterial genomes or studying highly repetitive genomic regions will need specialized hybrid-assembly algorithms. The 55.8% GC content is typical for Enterobacteriaceae.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0