PRJNA487001

BioProject first seen 2019

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

amplicon

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

NextSeq 550

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

11 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 42353743431 reported

total reads 182810463 reported

n content pct 0.023 measured

pct q20 bases 97.5 measured

pct q30 bases 96.3 measured

gc content pct 46.9 measured

mean read length 103 measured

mean base quality 34.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 60.79 measured

mean target coverage 683.1 extrapolated

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.3 measured ×1 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.5 100%

QC cost 18 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0