Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA488266

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

WGS from Gossypium aridum; perfect A-grade (100/100). Flawless duplication (1.97%) and perfect base quality (100% Q20 and Q30) ensure minimal false calls for plant genome assembly and variant mapping, providing exceptional confidence for downstream population and phylogenetic studies.

Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Gossypium aridum
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
23 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 779424752018 reported
total reads 3726388174 reported
n content pct 0.001 measured
pct q20 bases 100 measured
pct q30 bases 100 measured
gc content pct 35.7 measured
mean read length 100 measured
mean base quality 30 measured
adapter content pct 0 measured
duplication rate pct 1.97 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 100 measured ×1 100%
duplication rate pct 1.97 measured ×0.5 100%
adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 13 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 87