← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Abra alba
Instrument
BGISEQ-500
Platform
BGISEQ
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
10,346 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
489642634657395
reported
total reads
1691891663508
reported
n content pct
0.002
measured
pct q20 bases
96.9
measured
pct q30 bases
91.7
measured
gc content pct
45.9
measured
mean read length
151
measured
mean base quality
35.6
measured
adapter content pct
0.59
measured
duplication rate pct
22.71
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
91.7
measured
×1
100%
adapter content pct
0.59
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
20 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0