← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
66/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Acanthis flammea
Instrument
BGISEQ-500
Platform
BGISEQ
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1,656 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
96698749763563
reported
total reads
372429348802
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
87.7
measured
pct q30 bases
76.7
measured
gc content pct
40.3
measured
mean read length
125
measured
mean base quality
32.4
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
0.36
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 66/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
76.7
measured
×1
34%
mean base quality
32.4
measured
×0.6
73%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
0.36
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
28 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0