Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Arabidopsis amplicon-seq on NextSeq 500 produces 12 billion bases (40.9 million reads) with high quality (96% Q30 bases), enabling confident targeted analysis of plant genetic variation. The excellent quality and model-organism context support fine-scale population genetics, genotype–phenotype associations, and marker validation in this extensively annotated plant.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0