Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

PRJNA494345

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:opus

This is a bulk human RNA-seq dataset (Illumina HiSeq 2500, ~1.79 billion reads), and it earns a fully measured grade-A verdict: the read-level quality metrics that actually drive reuse were directly measured, not extrapolated (evidence_strength=1), so the rating is solid rather than provisional. The grade is anchored by an excellent pct_q30_bases of 95.2% alongside a mean base quality of 36.5 — meaning the overwhelming majority of bases are called with high confidence, which is the single most important factor for trustworthy spliced alignment and quantification — while negligible adapter content (0.02%) confirms the reads are clean and ready to map without aggressive trimming. The only metric worth a researcher's attention is the 23.22% duplication rate; this did not lower the score and is entirely normal for deep RNA-seq (where highly expressed transcripts legitimately produce identical fragments), but for applications sensitive to PCR artifacts, such as allele-specific or low-input analyses, you may want to inspect whether it reflects optical/PCR duplicates versus genuine expression. With a 65 bp mean read length, alignment and standard differential-expression reuse are well supported, though the relatively short reads modestly limit isoform-level and novel-junction resolution.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
92 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 116343777290 reported
total reads 1789904266 reported
n content pct 0.006 measured
pct q20 bases 97.7 measured
pct q30 bases 95.2 measured
gc content pct 48.2 measured
mean read length 65 measured
mean base quality 36.5 measured
adapter content pct 0.02 measured
duplication rate pct 23.22 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.2 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 36.5 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0.02 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 23.22 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 20 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 66