← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
12/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
6 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
11151924900
reported
total reads
37173083
reported
n content pct
23.341
measured
pct q20 bases
59.9
measured
pct q30 bases
55.5
measured
gc content pct
40.5
measured
mean read length
150
measured
mean base quality
23.7
measured
adapter content pct
10.07
measured
duplication rate pct
81.97
measured
mean target coverage
179.9
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 12/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
55.5
measured
×1
0%
adapter content pct
10.07
measured
×0.5
35%
QC cost
21 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0