Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
46/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This WGS dataset of Limosilactobacillus vaginalis on a 454 GS FLX Titanium platform generated 235,000 reads with notably low quality (25.2% Q20/Q30), reflecting 454 platform characteristics and the challenges of sequencing vaginal commensals. Researchers examining vaginal microbiota genomics or validating assembly algorithms with challenging legacy data will need stringent quality filtering. The 40.6% GC content is typical for lactic acid bacteria.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0