← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
41/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Gymnadenia conopsea
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
106 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
74979731988
reported
total reads
403170971
reported
n content pct
0.011
measured
pct q20 bases
82
measured
pct q30 bases
72.3
measured
gc content pct
34.4
measured
mean read length
126
measured
mean base quality
31.5
measured
adapter content pct
14.43
measured
duplication rate pct
9.94
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 41/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
72.3
measured
×1
12%
mean base quality
31.5
measured
×0.6
58%
adapter content pct
14.43
measured
×0.4
31%
duplication rate pct
9.94
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
18 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0