Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
62/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of the Eurasian bullfinch (Sinosuthora webbiana bulomacha) using Illumina HiSeq 2000, producing 3.9 billion short reads and over 1 trillion bases for avian genomic reference and population genetics. Supports phylogenomic reconstruction, chromosomal synteny analysis, and identification of adaptive variants in wild bird populations; the 42.9% GC content and moderate Q30 rate (75.4%) are typical for non-model organism WGS. High sequencing depth provides sufficient coverage for copy-number and structural variant calling in passerine genomes.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0