Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
77/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
MiSeq whole-genome sequencing of Limosilactobacillus reuteri (probiotic bacterium) with 1.16 million short reads and 300 Mb at exceptional quality (98.9% Q20, 98.6% Q30). Adequate for complete bacterial genome assembly; redundant depth relative to typical 100-200 Mb requirement for closed genomes.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0