Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This amplicon dataset of Haemophilus parainfluenzae on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform generated 8 million reads with 91.3% Q30 bases, capturing bacterial strain diversity and respiratory tract community composition. Researchers studying respiratory microbiota, otitis media pathogenesis, or pathogenic versus commensal Haemophilus ecology will find amplicon sequence data suitable for population analysis. The 54.9% GC content is typical for Haemophilus species.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0