Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This feces metagenome amplicon dataset on an Illumina MiSeq platform contains 4 million reads with 88% Q30 bases, providing a small-scale gut microbiota snapshot. Researchers needing focused single-sample or low-diversity microbiome data for pilot studies or method development will find this dataset useful; however, the limited read depth restricts comprehensive community profiling and detection of rare bacterial members.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0