Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
74/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq of Homo sapiens. Grade C (74/100) — marginal quality. Q30 bases at 80.3% (measured, weight 1.0) fall short of ideal (~90%) for sensitive isoform detection, and mean base quality (32.5, measured) is moderate; low-abundance transcripts and fine-grained splice variants may be unreliable, though high-level expression quantification is feasible with filtering.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0